🔗 Share this article

Accepting the need for change

The manager's favored wing-back setup cannot be blamed entirely of United's ongoing challenges. Old Trafford are rebuilding after years of poor stewardship and the current squad continues its rebuilding process, with strengths in some areas while obvious flaws continue elsewhere.

However, tactical weaknesses are present in the current tactical approach, most notably numerical disadvantages in the middle and issues out wide that need addressing. Other coaches have effectively handled analogous problems – the former Chelsea boss with Chelsea and the Crystal Palace manager with the Eagles demonstrate that on-field intelligence proves more important than starting positions.

United's coach recently declared: "The tactical setup isn't at fault, our performances are," comparable to focusing on effects instead of root issues. Competitors have regularly exposed the same weaknesses in United's setup for multiple months, not resulting from player misunderstanding but because the system itself has fundamental issues.

Consequently, fans shouldn't expect a magical fix where the system suddenly works, just as costly acquisitions cannot single-handedly fix the fundamental problems. The London club's recent match serves as a perfect example – even after losing their head coach and crucial performers during the summer transfer window, they adjusted their system intentionally to expose the Red Devils' consistent system.

When Erik ten Hag arrived at Old Trafford, it became apparent that Ajax's playing style wouldn't translate to English football; his refusal to modify proved decisive in his final downfall. Now Amorim – who appears to have the complete skill set for the game's most demanding role except tactical flexibility – is mirroring similar errors and missing a lifetime chance. Following generations Old Trafford possesses proprietors dedicated to securing victories rather than profit generation.

Changing center-back responsibilities

Outside centre-backs serve important purposes in United's formation: they carry possession forward, perform defensive interventions, monitor spaces, alter attacking focus, initiate attacks and support attacks. Any football expert might wonder whether employing a duo of such complete footballers in a three-man defense seems reasonable when a back four could address midfield shortages.

Presently, these centre-backs find themselves restricted by rival forwards who, by standing nearby, hinder them from advancing into midfield as the system requires. This development enables clubs with midfield overloads to bypass the central areas, creating urgent problems that need addressing.

Potential fixes include ordering stoppers to join midfield despite risks – though this risks defensive exposure – or withdrawing the attacker to improve build-up play, limiting forward options but benefiting from his progression. The smartest modification involves changing the high-press system from 3-1-6 or 3-2-5 to a more balanced 4-4-2 that provides better coverage and eliminates the need for stopper to join midfield.

Reintegrating Kobbie Mainoo

Amorim's preferred style of chaotic direct football forces the team to empty central areas and depend on direct passes, counting on individual brilliance rather than systematic chance creation. While statistical metrics suggest improvement, match observations reveal that present attacking output result primarily from spot-kick decisions and hopeful shots rather than sustained pressure.

Successful sides dominate games through pace control. United's inability to do this cannot be entirely blamed on Amorim's approach; reports indicate he asked for midfield reinforcement during the summer window but met disagreement from club executives. Beyond fault allocation, the current situation proves unworkable.

The manager's first-choice pairing of the Brazilian and Portuguese, backed up by the summer signing providing cover, has limited opportunities for the young Englishman. Although reasonable doubts exist about his athletic maturity and progressive passing, excluding such talent creates doubts about the tactical plan's suitability.

The current midfield options embody fast-paced play, whereas Mainoo offers pace management. At Sporting Lisbon, his side could launch early attacks due to talent disparity against domestic competition, confident they would regain control if the attack broke down. However in the Premier League, the overall quality means careless possession loss receives instant retribution, while athletic superiority by itself cannot guarantee success.

Mainoo's technical quality stands out, and even if playing him with Fernandes creates defensive concerns, these issues become secondary in a possession-dominant team. Considering the team's concession rate showing they allow superior scoring situations than every other team, including the youngster appears reasonable to try as different methods have shown limitations. Although questions persist about his exact role in Amorim's approach, match experience represents the best development path and would unlikely deteriorate the current situation.

Improving wing effectiveness

On United's right side, the combination of Amad Diallo and Bryan Mbeumo could prove effective given their similar characteristics of creativity, intelligence and determination. When combined with the young French defender, they could form an effective combination that improves creative output. Right now however, predictable positioning makes opponents' jobs simpler for organized defenses.

The manager needs to introduce organized interchange routines that generate confusion through frequent role switching. Passing sequences need to demonstrate variety – not always to feet but often into space to optimize forward movement. This method enables inward movement, eliminating markers and creating passing lanes for attempts on goal or deliveries.

In left-wing areas, Patrick Dorgu often obtains possession in advanced areas despite lacking the technical refinement to utilize productively. Adjusting his positioning somewhat further back would leverage his tackling and ball-carrying strength to {supply more creative players|service better attackers|provide for