🔗 Share this article

The recent US security policy document presents a misguided assessment of Europe. The document asserts that open-border policies and what it terms "woke" policies pose an existential threat to the continent's identity. Yet, this perspective is based on a fundamental misreading of the reality. The actual danger confronting the EU is not cultural but economic and technological lag.

A Glaring Growth Gap Between Europe and the US

The data reveal a stark picture. From 2008 and 2023, American economic output surged by eighty-seven percent, while a mere 13.5% growth for the EU. Over this period, European income per person fell from 76.5% to just half of the US level. Strikingly, even Mississippi now has a greater average income than major EU nations like Italy and France.

Currently, about half of the global 50 largest technology firms are American, while only four are from Europe.

The Technological Shortfall: A Critical Question

The growing disparity is driven by stronger efficiency gains in the United States, largely due to technological innovation and better use of resources. The landscape of global tech dominance is overwhelmingly US-centric. In the last five decades, hundreds of American startups have scaled into enterprises valued at more than ten billion dollars, versus only fourteen in the European continent.

This gap prompts a vital question: In the race for tomorrow's sectors like AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing, what is Europe positioned? Experts widely agree it is largely a contest between two between the US and China, with Europe starting at a significant handicap.

Root Causes of Europe's Innovation Gap

A number of major reasons explain this technological divide.

• Venture Capital: The United States has a much more robust and more dynamic system for financing new ventures. The EU has yet to establish a true unified investment market, a factor that caps the scale of new firms.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided regulation hinder Europe. A US startup can launch a service under a single regulatory framework to access a market of hundreds of millions. The EU, despite a larger population size, is split among twenty-seven separate systems, creating significant market obstacles.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on entrepreneurial failure differ sharply. In some EU nations, a startup's collapse was once viewed with stigma, whereas in the United States, it is often seen as a valuable lesson.
• Defense Spending: The US benefits from a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. Europe's chronic underinvestment in defense has weakened its ability in breakthrough innovation.

The Road Ahead: Reasons for Hopefulness

Despite these challenges, one can find causes for optimism. European leaders are growing more conscious of the severe threat and have started to advance serious reform. Key reports on European competitiveness and the single market highlight the need for sweeping changes.

With the right policies and rule changes, Europe's strengths could support much higher degrees of commercial innovation.

Europe still possesses significant advantages: skilled workforce, excellent education systems, and premier labs. Alongside a large internal market and substantial household savings, these foundations have the potential to trigger a new wave of venture creation.

Importantly, even if Europe does not take the lead in creating next-generation technologies, it can still dramatically increase productivity by adopting and adapting innovations from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

The European Union now stands at a decisive moment. To paraphrase a famous line, decline often happens "slowly, then all at once". So far, the continent's slide in innovation has been gradual. However, if it fails to take decisive action to address its structural weaknesses, today's gradual weakening could turn into a rapid and permanent loss of world influence.